|
Humpback Whale and Calf
|
Since 1997, Green Vegans board members have attended five IWC meetings. We lobbied at those meetings for everything that would protect whales from unnecessary harm. Unfortunately, the IWC does not protect the far larger number of small Cetaceans (smaller whales and dolphins).
Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling
We also address aboriginal subsistence whaling (ASW) quotas. After those quotas are issued, the contracting governments divide the whales between themselves. These quotas have been allocated every five years. Now, in 2012 at the 64th meeting of the IWC in Panama, another quota decision will be made, this time for six years. We will not have another chance to influence these quotas until 2018. As proposed, up to 2,430 whales will be killed under ASW with more allowed to be wounded and escape.
Three species of whales are included in the joint ASW US/Russian/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines proposal: humpback whales; gray whales; and bowhead whales. The Greenland proposal includes four: fin, minke, bowhead, and humpback whales. The quotas to kill them include five areas from Siberia to the Caribbean. Aboriginal subsistence whaling is a highly controversial, divisive, and sensitive issue. Few organizations are willing to oppose it entirely. Because of this, important criteria that qualify hunts as subsistence are not closely examined by the IWC member governments.
When positions are taken at the IWC, distinctions are usually made regarding the appropriateness and need for ASW on a case-by-case basis. In recent years the IWC has accepted "cultural" need as sufficient when the IWC language itself requires demonstrated nutritional need. In addition, the ASW proposals are strategically lumped into one proposal, thus allowing the extraordinary differences in each case to be ignored.
For instance, the Makah of Neah Bay, Washington State, supported by the U.S. Government without due diligence with regard to the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act, have proposed a highly controversial resumption of whaling that has incurred significant opposition but will be included in the US/Russian/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines joint proposal. This makes the Makah hunt and other highly questionable proposals nearly impervious to challenge. Other ASW proposals are approved though they involve horrendously inhumane killing methods even by whaling standards.
The joint (bundled) US/Russian/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ASW proposal targets humpback whales in the Caribbean. The Greenland proposal, though it does not allow it, would enable the continuation of whale meat being sold to the public in supermarkets. Saint Vincent/ Grenadines whalers have a history of wounding humpback whale calves to lure their protective mothers in for killing. As part of our advocacy at the IWC, we will address the ample documentation of the lack of necessity and cruelty of these hunts.
Our three-person Green Vegans delegation will provide a uniquely complimentary and insightful ability to respectfully and intelligently address these issues. While we have advocated for whales for a number of highly respected organizations for decades, we founded Green Vegans in 2009 to introduce a new perspective to deep ecology environmentalism and species' rights.
In our next posting via E Magazine services, we will give you the links and means to follow the developments at IWC 64 in daily reports from us and other organizations, and presumably link to a live televised-feed.
No comments:
Post a Comment